{"version":"1.0","type":"rich","provider_name":"Context XXI","provider_url":"http:\/\/contextxxi.org","title":"On Social Repression in Culture\n","author_name":"Lothar Fischer \u25aa \nReuben Keehan (translation) \u25aa \nDieter Kunzelmann \u25aa \nUwe Lausen \u25aa \nHeimrad Prem \u25aa \nHelmut Sturm \u25aa \nHans Peter Zimmer","width":"1200","height":"800","url":"http:\/\/www.contextxxi.at\/on-social-repression-in-culture.html","html":"\u003Ch4 class='title'\u003E\u003Ca href='http:\/\/www.contextxxi.at\/on-social-repression-in-culture.html'\u003EOn Social Repression in Culture\n\u003C\/a\u003E\u003C\/h4\u003E\u003Cblockquote class='spip'\u003EIndividually, the artists of the modern era who do not simply reproduce the permissible mystifications have all clearly been more or less rejected to the fringes of social life. This is because they are obliged to pose \u2014 even through illusory or fragmentary means \u2014 the question of the meaning of this life: the question of its use; while it remains without meaning, it has no lawful use outside of passive consumption. By its very nature, then, it signals the wretched conditions of an \u003Ca href=\"on-social-repression-in-culture.html\" class=' pts_suite'\u003E(...)\u003C\/a\u003E\u003C\/blockquote\u003E\n"}